Schwerter, Eva, ev (2022) A Meta-Analysis on the Connection Between Threat Origin and Need Dissatisfaction. Master thesis, Psychology.
|
Text
i hope this is a real pdf now.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
A thesis is an aptitude test for students. The approval of the thesis is proof that the student has sufficient research and reporting skills to graduate but does not guarantee the quality of the research and the results of the research as such, and the thesis is therefore not necessarily suitable to be used as an academic source to refer to. If you would like to know more about the research discussed in this thesis and any publications based on it, to which you could refer, please contact the supervisor mentioned.
Abstract
Considering the large amount of literature on distinct threats, Reiss et al. (2021) suggested an extensive threat categorization system, e.g., according to phenomenological origin (threat: social or personal). The current project investigates this threat distinction, two of their related hypotheses (moderation hypotheses) and one underlying claim (main hypothesis). For this, the method of choice was a meta-analysis (116 correlations from 103 studies). However, this approach requires more explicit definitions than given by Reiss et al. (2021). Thus, we interpreted their threat distinction (origin: social or personal) based on the construal-level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010) and the social identity theory (Hogg, 2016). The resulting findings were in line with (1) our main hypothesis, indicating a correlation between psychological threats and basic need dissatisfaction in general (r = 0.49, p < .0001, 95% CI [0.43, 0.55]), (2) with our first moderation hypothesis, suggesting a stronger correlation between personal threats and autonomy need dissatisfaction (r = 0.38 [0.29, 0.47]) than between personal threats and other need dissatisfaction (r = 0.22 [0.16, 0.29]) (3) and, with our second moderation hypothesis, indicating a stronger correlation between social threats and belongingness need dissatisfaction (r = 0.65 [0.58, 0.71]) than between social threats and other need dissatisfaction (r = 0.44 [0.33, 0.54]). Primary limitations was the inevitable deviation from Reiss et al.’s (2021) original threat categories and the restricted scope of the project. Altogether, these findings point to the applicability of Reiss et al.’s (2021) threat distinction and related assumptions. Further investigation recommended. Keywords: personal threat, social threat, basic needs, construal-level theory
| Item Type: | Thesis (Master) |
|---|---|
| Supervisor name: | Agostini, M. |
| Degree programme: | Psychology |
| Differentiation route: | Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology (WOP) [Master Psychology] |
| Date Deposited: | 31 Mar 2022 11:38 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Mar 2022 11:38 |
| URI: | http://gmwpublic.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/365 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |