Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display

Affective Forecasting Accuracy Across Different Interval Lengths and Affective Valences

Liepelt, Fabienne-Renée (2025) Affective Forecasting Accuracy Across Different Interval Lengths and Affective Valences. Bachelor thesis, Psychology.

[img]
Preview
Text
Bachelor-Thesis-F.-Liepelt-S5104491.pdf

Download (803kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Affective forecasting, predicting future emotional states, significantly influences decision-making. However, humans tend to be inaccurate in forecasting their future affect because they overestimate the duration and intensity of their future emotions (impact bias). The impact of emotional valence and different interval lengths on affective forecasting accuracy, as well as differences between human and statistical model forecasts have been researched separately leaving unclear how these variables might interact. Aims: This study investigated whether human affective forecasting accuracy decreases with longer time intervals, whether this effect varies by emotional valence, and how human accuracy compares to Kalman filter predictions across 3-hour and 6-hour intervals. Methods: We conducted a 14-day experience sampling study in which participants responded to five daily prompts measuring current and predicted positive and negative affect. Absolute prediction errors were analyzed via multilevel models, comparing human and model forecasts. Results: Human prediction accuracy decreases when the interval size increases. However, this effect is independent of the emotional valence, contradicting previous research. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the Kalman filter and human forecasting accuracy. Conclusions: While human affective forecasts are more accurate for the near than the distant future, which applies equally to predicting positive and negative affect, the Kalman filter does not perform significantly differently than humans. However, differences in operationalization of interval size as differences in event specificity (specific event vs daily life forecasts) may limit the generalizability of our findings which could be a starting point for future research. Keywords: affective forecast, experience sampling, statistical model, interval size

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Supervisor name: Petersen, F.J.
Degree programme: Psychology
Differentiation route: None [Bachelor Psychology]
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2025 07:34
Last Modified: 23 Jul 2025 07:34
URI: http://gmwpublic.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/5656

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item