Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display

Design Personalization and Trust in a Tangible Neurofeedback Companion: The impact of Cognitive Functioning, Gender, and Generation Cohorts

Lupașcu, Alberta-Maria (2025) Design Personalization and Trust in a Tangible Neurofeedback Companion: The impact of Cognitive Functioning, Gender, and Generation Cohorts. Bachelor thesis, Psychology.

[img]
Preview
Text
BachelorThesisAlbertaLupascu.pdf

Download (668kB) | Preview

A thesis is an aptitude test for students. The approval of the thesis is proof that the student has sufficient research and reporting skills to graduate but does not guarantee the quality of the research and the results of the research as such, and the thesis is therefore not necessarily suitable to be used as an academic source to refer to. If you would like to know more about the research discussed in this thesis and any publications based on it, to which you could refer, please contact the supervisor mentioned.


Abstract

Introduction: While robot-assisted technologies are increasingly used in clinical settings, little is known about how non-visual design elements shape perceived trustworthiness across user characteristics. This study investigated how features such as name and voice influence trust in a tangible neurofeedback companion, and whether these effects vary across individual differences in cognitive functioning, gender, and generation. Methods: Participants completed an online questionnaire (N = 743) in Qualtrics in which they rated the trust for four robot voices (female, robotic, childlike, male) and four names (Sunni, Tully, Nova, Juno). A repeated-measures design was employed for both name and voice ratings. Trust in names was compared across gender and generational cohorts, while ratings for voices were analyzed across self-reported executive and attentional functioning, gender, and generation. Results: Trust ratings differed significantly across names, F (2.71, 1672.96) = 10.23, p < .001, with competent sounding names (Nova, Juno) rated higher than the ones eliciting warmth (Sunni, Tully). Voice also significantly influenced trust, F (1.78, 1062.70) = 13.34, p < .001, and trust varied more across user profiles as shown by a significant interaction between voice, gender and attention complaints (p = .039). The male and the female voices were preferred over the robotic and childlike ones. Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of personalized design in a tangible neurofeedback companion as trust emerges from the interplay between design features and user characteristics. Future research should explore how these preferences evolve during face-to-face embodied interactions and long-time engagement.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Supervisor name: Enriquez Geppert, S.
Degree programme: Psychology
Differentiation route/Track: None [Bachelor Psychology]
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2025 08:03
Last Modified: 23 Jul 2025 08:03
URI: http://gmwpublic.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/5672

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item