Juganaru, Sara Maria (2025) Acceptability of Tangible Neurofeedback Companions Across Age and Clinical Status. Bachelor thesis, Psychology.
|
Text
Thesis-S.-M.-Juganaru.pdf Download (674kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: Neurofeedback is a promising intervention for enhancing cognitive functioning and alleviating clinical symptoms through self-regulation of brain activity. However, 30-50% of users are non-responders, indicating the need for more engaging protocols. One proposed solution is a tangible, robot-like learning companion that provides real-time, adaptive feedback. The successful implementation of the agent depends on its feasibility, particularly its acceptability. This study aimed to assess whether the acceptability of the agent varies by clinical status and age group, and whether age influences the impact of clinical status on acceptability. Methods: An online survey was administered to a convenience sample of 619 adults. Participants were grouped into clinical, subclinical, and healthy, as well as young, middle-aged, and old. The survey included demographic questions, cognitive concerns, personality traits, and acceptability and design preferences of the neurofeedback companion. A two-way ANOV A was used to examine the effects of clinical status and age group on acceptability. Results: Overall, acceptability was high (M = 66.56; SD = 16.56). No significant main effects were found for clinical status (F(2, 610) = 2.01; p = .135) or age (F(2, 610) = 1.79; p = .168), and no interaction effect emerged (F(4, 610) = 1.45; p = .216). Acceptability scores remained consistently positive across all groups. Discussion and Conclusion: Contrary to expectations, neither clinical need nor age influenced the acceptability of the tangible, neurofeedback companion. The findings suggest a broad overall acceptability of the companion, providing a strong foundation for the introduction of the intervention into clinical practice. Keywords: neurofeedback, tangible neurofeedback companion, feasibility, acceptability, age differences, clinical status
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) |
|---|---|
| Supervisor name: | Enriquez Geppert, S. |
| Degree programme: | Psychology |
| Differentiation route: | None [Bachelor Psychology] |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Jul 2025 10:04 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2025 10:04 |
| URI: | http://gmwpublic.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/5691 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |