Patzelt, Theres (2022) Measuring Stress: A Cross-instrumental Validity and Reproducibility Study. Bachelor thesis, Psychology.
|
Text
StressandCrossValidity_T.patzelt_s3973832.pdf Download (889kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Electrocardiography (ECG) is commonly used in psychological research and clinical practice; however, ECG machines are impracticable. This study cross-validates two wireless alternatives (Empatica E4 and polar H10) and assesses whether they agree with the golden standard. The monitors are normed to the REFA. To assess the validity of these devices, participants performed different tasks. Methods: An within-subject experiment was conducted. Participants (N= 28) performed a resting, physical and mental task (Stroop task and emotional Stroop) while being attached to the three devices. Results: The polar was highly agreeable and correlated with the REFA. The devices did not find a difference between the Stroop tasks. The devices found a difference between the physical and resting task. Limitations: The Empatica E4 did not collect enough data points to be accurately compared. Conclusion: The polar is highly agreeable with the REFA and can be used as valid alternative.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) |
|---|---|
| Supervisor name: | Span, M.M. and Waard, D. de |
| Degree programme: | Psychology |
| Differentiation route: | None [Bachelor Psychology] |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2022 09:18 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Jul 2022 09:18 |
| URI: | http://gmwpublic.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/757 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |